Obvious Solution To Housing & Homeless Problem

  • January 3, 2023
  • 3 min read

In the ever-evolving landscape of construction and housing, challenges persist, contributing to the housing crisis that plagues many regions. A recent article in The Atlantic delves into the intricacies of homelessness, shedding light on the underlying issues while posing a critical question: Why is everyone seemingly ignoring the problem? This blog post aims to dissect the hidden nuances within the article, offering insights into the complexities faced by builders and contractors.

The Subtle Oversight: Analyzing the Subtitle

The Atlantic’s article explores the homelessness crisis, emphasizing a significant, albeit overlooked, aspect with its subtitle: “Why everyone’s ignoring it.” However, the reality is that those entrenched in the building industry aren’t turning a blind eye to the issue; they’ve been grappling with it for years. The crux lies in a specific statement within the article that warrants closer examination.

Decoding the Disconnect: “Places Stop Building”

A crucial assertion in the article asserts, “The places people needed to move stopped building the housing necessary.” This, however, is a subtle misrepresentation of the situation. Cities or regions don’t physically construct houses; it is the work of contractors, construction companies, and home builders. The actual question should be: Why did these builders stop building in areas facing housing challenges?

The True Culprit: Loss and Cost as Obstacles

Builders do not cease construction arbitrarily; underlying factors such as loss, cost, and impediments play a pivotal role. The primary hurdle in several areas is the cumbersome process of obtaining permits, approvals, and navigating through a labyrinth of bureaucratic obstacles. In certain jurisdictions, the intrinsic costs, including fees and approvals, become prohibitively expensive, making housing projects economically unviable.

Time is Money: Carrying Costs and Delayed Projects

The article briefly touches on the extended timeline from purchasing land to delivering a completed house, highlighting a crucial aspect. Carrying costs associated with prolonged projects, combined with bureaucratic delays, inflate the overall expenses for builders. This financial burden, when coupled with the uncertainty of lengthy approval processes, prompts builders to seek more favorable locations.

Political Implications: Recognizing the Risk

The Atlantic article subtly alludes to the political repercussions of ignoring the housing crisis, emphasizing the potential risk to politicians who fail to address the issue adequately. However, the focus primarily centers on the political fallout rather than the actual impact on individuals in need of homes.

Policy Missteps: A Call for Recognition and Change

While the article identifies the problem, it falls short in acknowledging the self-inflicted nature of the obstacles. It touches upon the impact of regulations, laws, and norms imposed by local politicians, especially in Democratic states. The unintended consequence of these policies is a severe shortage of homes, with the U.S. facing a deficit of millions of housing units.

A Need for Comprehensive Solutions

Addressing the housing crisis requires a comprehensive approach. Recognizing that obstacles stem from policies and regulations, rather than the willingness of builders, is a crucial first step. The article, while highlighting the political risks associated with inaction, inadvertently underscores the need for policymakers to reassess and streamline regulations to encourage housing development. The solution lies in fostering an environment where builders can construct homes efficiently and affordably, ultimately benefiting those in need and the communities at large. Share your thoughts and comments below; let’s engage in a constructive conversation on this pressing issue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

wpChatIcon